Today's Horse Racing
-
CLOWNSHOES
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2014 8:04 pm
Samo154 wrote:16:55 inplay crazy! Lay book at 125 whole race pretty much
It was the same pre off only on the back side
Caused some probs, for Bots on other sites ... 
-
ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
Shaken out early 
Must have been playing up, madness in the last 10 seconds!
Must have been playing up, madness in the last 10 seconds!You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
Last few seconds of Goodwood all over the place as well
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
steven1976
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:28 am
What does it mean for us simpletons? The horse didn't run but people were still backing it?LinusP wrote:Fave was a non-runner but not removed before the race started, therefore xm off
Yep, it was still in the market so you could back/lay it but all orders are void, can create very dangerous scenarios where by you use the 'non-runner' to balance your book.steven1976 wrote: What does it mean for us simpletons? The horse didn't run but people were still backing it?
Theoretically you can go into negative balance once it has been removed
-
steven1976
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:28 am
BF was so much nicer when it was punter vs punter.
-
Crazyskier
- Posts: 1303
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 6:36 pm
steven1976 wrote:BF was so much nicer when it was punter vs punter.
+1000000000000000000
-
ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
I love seeing manipulation. Gives me a clearer idea of where the "smart money" thinks the price is goingsteven1976 wrote:BF was so much nicer when it was punter vs punter.
