Tennis Help Needed Please
Dallas, this has failed to fire in the current Zhang/Sasnovich match - 3rd set
I wanted to Lay Sasnovich when she broke Zhang 1st game, 3rd set, but no bet has been triggered.
Is this because no bet was triggered in the second set? I am puzzled - does the 3rd set not need an extra rule adding?
sorry for all these questions!
I wanted to Lay Sasnovich when she broke Zhang 1st game, 3rd set, but no bet has been triggered.
Is this because no bet was triggered in the second set? I am puzzled - does the 3rd set not need an extra rule adding?
sorry for all these questions!
If you can attach the file ill take a quick look later this evening/early morning for youmjay wrote: ↑Wed May 31, 2017 5:52 pmDallas, this has failed to fire in the current Zhang/Sasnovich match - 3rd set
I wanted to Lay Sasnovich when she broke Zhang 1st game, 3rd set, but no bet has been triggered.
Is this because no bet was triggered in the second set? I am puzzled - does the 3rd set not need an extra rule adding?
sorry for all these questions!
thanks very much please find attached.
I feel it is because Zhang took the 1st set, therefore my 2nd set scenario did not trigger therefore there was no bet to rearm?
I feel it is because Zhang took the 1st set, therefore my 2nd set scenario did not trigger therefore there was no bet to rearm?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Its just your 'Checkpoint matched bets rule' - you have it set to trigger once (so it never triggered another checkpoint the start of the 5th set)
be sure to use a long rearm about 900secs to so it does not trigger twice on 3rd set if they have a long break at the start
be sure to use a long rearm about 900secs to so it does not trigger twice on 3rd set if they have a long break at the start
Dallas
could I please confirm that this revision will work even if my first scenario does not happen,
i.e the player I want to lay WINS the 1st set rather than loses it, then loses the 2nd set - I still want a lay bet to trigger
on the 3rd set.
this was my concern with the match yesterday - I did not trigger the first bet so why would changing the trigger value make a difference?
thanks
could I please confirm that this revision will work even if my first scenario does not happen,
i.e the player I want to lay WINS the 1st set rather than loses it, then loses the 2nd set - I still want a lay bet to trigger
on the 3rd set.
this was my concern with the match yesterday - I did not trigger the first bet so why would changing the trigger value make a difference?
thanks
The rule is set to lay the player if they go a set and break up, you'll need to checkpoint the matched bets 5 times (once each set) unless you add a condition to only do it when there has been bets matched - it makes no difference which way you do it, I'd just set it for 5 times with a 900sec rearmmjay wrote: ↑Thu Jun 01, 2017 11:12 amDallas
could I please confirm that this revision will work even if my first scenario does not happen,
i.e the player I want to lay WINS the 1st set rather than loses it, then loses the 2nd set - I still want a lay bet to trigger
on the 3rd set.
this was my concern with the match yesterday - I did not trigger the first bet so why would changing the trigger value make a difference?
thanks
the re-arm time is entered just to the right of the number of triggers on the 'General' tab.
Dallas,
Firstly I am only looking at WTA - so 3 sets is the max scenario
you say
"The rule is set to lay the player if they go a set and break up"
but this rule can never be the case in the deciding WTA set as neither are a set ahead.
As I said before should I not add a new rule with a fixed score of 1 set all, and then the game conditions as already discussed?
Firstly I am only looking at WTA - so 3 sets is the max scenario
you say
"The rule is set to lay the player if they go a set and break up"
but this rule can never be the case in the deciding WTA set as neither are a set ahead.
As I said before should I not add a new rule with a fixed score of 1 set all, and then the game conditions as already discussed?
You can add the new rule if you want but you'll need to change the relative score conditions for from the initial ones i gavemjay wrote: ↑Thu Jun 01, 2017 2:19 pmDallas,
Firstly I am only looking at WTA - so 3 sets is the max scenario
you say
"The rule is set to lay the player if they go a set and break up"
but this rule can never be the case in the deciding WTA set as neither are a set ahead.
As I said before should I not add a new rule with a fixed score of 1 set all, and then the game conditions as already discussed?
just curious on how you got on with this also wondering why you would want to lay someone who is a set and a break up as in my eyes thats a great time to back lol im new to this and am just plying around with systems
also dallas your knowledge seems unstoppable in this software and you clearly understand everyones needs massive respect
also dallas your knowledge seems unstoppable in this software and you clearly understand everyones needs massive respect