Today's Horse Racing

The sport of kings.
Post Reply
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 25159
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am

In the excitement of backing a horse after the race is run, I could even have backed a horse with a similar name to the winner. You'd be amazed how many cats and bums appear in US horse names. :)
User avatar
Naffman
Posts: 5925
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:46 am

Ingenuity really not happy in parade
User avatar
Dallas
Posts: 23601
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:57 pm

Not been one of my favourite Monday evenings
spreadbetting
Posts: 3140
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:06 pm

LinusP wrote:
Mon Jul 23, 2018 7:01 pm
I think it’s fine, Derek is still taking a risk and is assuming that he knows more than the other player as there there could be a stewards enquiry.
I think we both know Derek's intention is to bet on a race after the result is known not take some outside risk on a race he's just watched finish. All he's looking for is to take advantage of races where Betfair are too incompetent to manage the market properly as he's stated most of them get void but he gets lucky once in a while at some innocent punters expense, not Betfair's. All I'm pointing out is that if you want to set yourself up as some kind moral guardian maybe you need to start at home first before judging others.

Derek27 wrote:
Mon Jul 23, 2018 7:09 pm
In the excitement of backing a horse after the race is run, I could even have backed a horse with a similar name to the winner. You'd be amazed how many cats and bums appear in US horse names. :)
And no doubt if you did you'd request Betfair void it as the result was known when the bet was placed and you couldn't possibly win ;)
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 25159
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am

Of course I would, but so can the other guy, and he may well have done.

I don't want to set myself up as a moral guardian, I just give an opinion like everybody else.

I'm still interested to know what your morals are on the example I gave earlier regarding a lone horse left standing, being laid at 1.01, market in-play, layers cannot possibly win?
Last edited by Derek27 on Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
eatyourgreens
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:53 am

hi all, I am very sorry to hiack this topic with something irrelevant but .............. I want to ask you lovely, helpful people in the ba community a quick question, but I cant find any way of posting it....... I have clicked through pages and pages and cant find how to post a question :-( if some one could please tell me how post , I would be very grateful, thanx in advance, and sorry again
User avatar
Dallas
Posts: 23601
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:57 pm

eatyourgreens wrote:
Mon Jul 23, 2018 8:52 pm
hi all, I am very sorry to hiack this topic with something irrelevant but .............. I want to ask you lovely, helpful people in the ba community a quick question, but I cant find any way of posting it....... I have clicked through pages and pages and cant find how to post a question :-( if some one could please tell me how post , I would be very grateful, thanx in advance, and sorry again
Here you go
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=16838
eatyourgreens
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:53 am

thanx dallas :-)
spreadbetting
Posts: 3140
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:06 pm

Derek27 wrote:
Mon Jul 23, 2018 8:41 pm

I'd still interested to know what your morals are on the example I gave earlier regarding a lone horse left standing, being laid at 1.01, market in-play, layers cannot possibly win?

In that situation I'd prefer Betfair to suspend the market as the result is known at the point there's only one chase runner left standing. But I'm not a fan of people laying fallers or being able to back unobtainable score lines which Betfair could easily stop . There's a basic rule in gambling where if you can't win you can't lose but obviously that's not always upheld and also possibly unworkable for fallers in fast moving in running markets, doesn't make it right just because you're able to do it though, I wouldn't be lumping on.



Surely you can see my confusion in the mixed messages you send Derek? One minute it's bad to rip people off the next it's the aim of the game, as for false claims who knows but I'd guess someone buying the guy's crappy systems probably has more of a chance of winning than being on the end of one of your past post bets.

Derek27 wrote:
Fri Jul 20, 2018 4:03 pm
Selling systems isn't getting your hands on the mug money, it's ripping people off!
Derek27 wrote:
Mon Jul 23, 2018 4:54 pm

I'm afraid ripping people off is part of betting and actually the aim of the game - the greater the value in the bet, the more ripping off you're doing. It's not comparable to making false claims about systems.
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 25159
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am

Selling isn't betting. The gap between wholesale price and retail price is the expense of production plus income for producing it. If either of those figures are overstated you are ripping the buyer off.

Betting just involves income for making a decision and the nature of the game involves aiming for as big a profit you can make. If you think a horse has a 3/1 chance, you're not going to say "I'll back it at 6/1 but I'm not taking the 10/1 available now, that's ripping off the layer"!
spreadbetting
Posts: 3140
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:06 pm

K, I'm much clearer now, it's OK to rip people off betting in situations where they have no chance of winning but not OK to 'possibly' rip people off selling them goods which may be of lesser value than advertised.
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 25159
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am

WTF do poker players do when they have a royal flush?

Do they fold because the other players have no chance of winning?

What if somebody raises their stake, do they show the other guy their cards and ask him to reconsider?

:lol: This is gambling SB.
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 25159
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am

What about matched betting, the innocent bookies can't win. :lol:

Free bets are offered in good faith and it's a breach of the bookies terms and conditions to cover the bet so you can't lose (they don't explicitly say with them). Nobody raises the moral issue with match bettors!
Last edited by Derek27 on Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ruthlessimon
Posts: 2161
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm

Me & Shaun - Strategy double act

Derek & SB - Moral double act

:D
User avatar
SeaHorseRacing
Posts: 2896
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 7:06 pm

Naffman wrote:
Mon Jul 23, 2018 7:50 pm
Ingenuity really not happy in parade
Thanks for that. I backed that and didn’t see the race.
Post Reply

Return to “Trading Horse racing”