In the 98,948 race sample I have 2008-2016 (962,380k horses), there have been 28 over 900, incl 17 @1000
2016 was a very unusual peak year with 13, but I suspect it's back to nearer 2 or 3
In the 98,948 race sample I have 2008-2016 (962,380k horses), there have been 28 over 900, incl 17 @1000
nahruthlessimon wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 6:11 pmIf they're laying the crap out of it; why would Peter & Dallas need to know it's pulling?
I'd argue it's the cold trader's (i.e. technical data) job to spot & follow the fundamentalists (i.e. the guys watching the paddock)
So you don't believe this is an edge?

For the drift, no.ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 6:18 pm& I have to know the fundamental reasons for the drift? Doubt it
what edge?ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 6:18 pmSo you don't believe this is an edge?
& I have to know the fundamental reasons for the drift? Doubt it
If any fundamental trader is good, they'll be staking big - which the technical traders will see & act upon. Pictures have a delay, money doesn'tdragontrades wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 6:25 pmwhat edge?
If the hose only briefly misbehaved you would get burned without pictures.