So the instances described by Wolf and the Deli Alli, Origi and Mane. Are they clear and obvious? It seems VAR is now examining everthing in minute detail and the flow of the game is turning into an American Football staccato, not scheduled for adverts, but for VAR to pore over an incident.Kafkaesque wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 4:05 pmI get the feeling, your allegiance is getting the better of you again. Do I need to post pics of Mane angleshooting againgreenmark wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 5:30 pmBeginning to get a bit paranoid about VAR. The Spurs goal allowed yesterday was reported as stonewall handball. Yet a LFC player was clearely fouled in the run up to a goal. We seem to have ended up with just as much debate but its decided by someone in a VAR studio.![]()
Gun to my head, was it a foul on Origi before United's goal, yes or no. Yeah probably. Clearly though, not a chance. Same for the Alli handball, gun to head, probably yeah. Stonewall, not a chance. Which makes both correct calls, if we're to follow the clear and obvious guideline.
Rather the issue for me is this. They're taking too long with these decisions. The Origi foul being the perfect example. If the VAR ref cannot spot instantly during play, or at most one quick replay, that something clear and obvious has been missed, then it by definition isn't. All this slowing it down and zooming in, they can feck right off with.
The illussion that VAR was or is going to eradicate unfair decisions and end controversy still persists. It was never going to be the case. So they should feeding it, by continuing to make what is still judgement calls on review.
Have to admit I didn't see this coming, I thought it would be a fair, objective process by experts.
Instead, its becoming farcical in its disruption of the flow of the game.
Perhaps the suggestion of 3 challenges for each Manager is a possibility? Forget who suggested that on here but....maybe?