I'm not Mark, it wasn't a serious post more a "why can't the guy speak in plain English" post! No doubt he feels the need to speak like that to make him sound more knowledgeable and important.

I'm not Mark, it wasn't a serious post more a "why can't the guy speak in plain English" post! No doubt he feels the need to speak like that to make him sound more knowledgeable and important.
Likewise if it goes down 10% you lose 10% not a multiple of it.gunnerryan wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:18 amI'm also not sure if I should leverage trades. Maybe I should start off with simple investments without any leverage, and if it goes up 10%, I make 10%.I suppose that's for me to work out![]()
From an investment point of view there is really only one issue … who will invest the money (you, an adviser or fund managers). Charges are relevant but don't choose on charges, a good return will easily cover if the charges are higher. Also relevant is service, some will accept poor service if the returns are higher while some will accept a lower return if they are told with good service!gunnerryan wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 7:13 pmI don't have an ISA of any kind so I'm leaning towards a stocks and shares ISA. Anyone got one and can recommend who to go with?
What platform do you lads use to make your long term stock investments? I'm very suspicious of trading platforms, they don't seem as straightforward as Betfair.
This advice contradicts what is suggested by Tim Hale in his book Smarter Investing - fees are the return killer, so keep them low as an absolute priority.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 1:50 amdon't choose on charges, a good return will easily cover if the charges are higher.gunnerryan wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 7:13 pmI don't have an ISA of any kind so I'm leaning towards a stocks and shares ISA. Anyone got one and can recommend who to go with?
What platform do you lads use to make your long term stock investments? I'm very suspicious of trading platforms, they don't seem as straightforward as Betfair.
What would you rather have … 10% return with 2% fees or 5% return with 1% fees? I appreciate there is an implicit element of hindsight in such a comparison but to me it's a no-brainer. The best is the best net return. Investment returns are much more variable than fee levels.arbitrage16 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 9:03 amThis advice contradicts what is suggested by Tim Hale in his book Smarter Investing - fees are the return killer, so keep them low as an absolute priority.
It's not even the element of hindsight, it's that you've just taken two examples out of thin air that fit your argument, so it's a completely useless comparison.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 1:11 pmWhat would you rather have … 10% return with 2% fees or 5% return with 1% fees? I appreciate there is an implicit element of hindsight in such a comparison but to me it's a no-brainer. The best is the best net return. Investment returns are much more variable than fee levels.arbitrage16 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 9:03 amThis advice contradicts what is suggested by Tim Hale in his book Smarter Investing - fees are the return killer, so keep them low as an absolute priority.