I think's you'd like this journalist on Twitter Dex...
Equal parts football and Boris bashing... he's a good follow
@tariqpanja
boris and rishi partygate fines
Sue Gray's report: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/ ... erings.pdf
-
- Posts: 3298
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
- Location: Newport
Many believe BJ is descended from Harry Houdini. He can get out of anything.Derek27 wrote: ↑Wed May 25, 2022 4:56 pmSue Gray's report: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/ ... erings.pdf
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
I've just emailed my MP.
Hi Chloe,
I’m just writing to ask, have you or do you intend to, send a letter of no confidence to the 1922 committee, or does the abhorrent, despicable, disgraceful, dishonest, loathsome, nauseating, reprehensible lying git command your full respect and support, to lead both, your party and this great country?
If it is the latter, can you assure me that while you remain as MP for North Norwich, you conduct your own constituency office in an appropriate manner, without frequent drunken vomiting parties, as indeed, your boss at No.10 indulges and allows his staff to indulge in?
Kind regards
Hi Chloe,
I’m just writing to ask, have you or do you intend to, send a letter of no confidence to the 1922 committee, or does the abhorrent, despicable, disgraceful, dishonest, loathsome, nauseating, reprehensible lying git command your full respect and support, to lead both, your party and this great country?
If it is the latter, can you assure me that while you remain as MP for North Norwich, you conduct your own constituency office in an appropriate manner, without frequent drunken vomiting parties, as indeed, your boss at No.10 indulges and allows his staff to indulge in?
Kind regards
Captain Hindsight predicted the u-turn in the windfall tax. It's a temporary windfall tax, but what is a temporary windfall tax? A windfall tax by definition is a one-off.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Thu Apr 28, 2022 6:38 amPolice to reopen investigation into Captain Hindsight and Beergate!
More bad news for BJ. Sunday Times claims Downing Street officials obtained a draft copy of Sue Gray's report and put pressure to change or remove names from it. Given that no explanation came forward about the purpose of the secret meeting it's quite believable.
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 2724
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
Oh dear, yet another example of you blindly jumping on the media bandwagon rather than do some of your own research ... now isn't that getting uncomfortably close to your own definition of lying?
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 2724
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
Still waiting for your proof the meeting was secret or is that another media bandwagon? You must have a season ticket.Derek27 wrote: ↑Sat May 28, 2022 11:42 pmMore bad news for BJ. Sunday Times claims Downing Street officials obtained a draft copy of Sue Gray's report and put pressure to change or remove names from it. Given that no explanation came forward about the purpose of the secret meeting it's quite believable.
Can you be specific about what I've got wrong?firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Sun May 29, 2022 7:39 amOh dear, yet another example of you blindly jumping on the media bandwagon rather than do some of your own research ... now isn't that getting uncomfortably close to your own definition of lying?
The meeting was secret in that, it should never have happened, if it did happen it should have been transparent and the public are entitled to know about it. They kept quiet about it and it took an investigative journalist to blow their cover, a month after the meeting.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Sun May 29, 2022 7:41 amStill waiting for your proof the meeting was secret or is that another media bandwagon? You must have a season ticket.Derek27 wrote: ↑Sat May 28, 2022 11:42 pmMore bad news for BJ. Sunday Times claims Downing Street officials obtained a draft copy of Sue Gray's report and put pressure to change or remove names from it. Given that no explanation came forward about the purpose of the secret meeting it's quite believable.
Given the level of dishonesty in the present government, it's reasonable for the public to be concerned that BJ would try to influence the investigation. Both, Downing Street and Sue Gray won't say what the meeting was about, so something fishy seems to be going on.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.