Off the mark on this one, although looked fairly competitive.
Greyhound Musings
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by wearthefoxhat on Fri Jul 15, 2022 12:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
This race worked out well, I like the way the RP had written it off. (not considered by timeform either)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
As previously said, when "we" both agree...no joy. (RP did get it right this time.. )
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Concluded well today. Although both TRtd matched (and lost), my 2nd TR performed well at a decent price, and was value. (TF not considered it)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
So, you dutching both when you don't agree ?wearthefoxhat wrote: ↑Fri Jul 15, 2022 11:28 amStill encouraging results going forward. I've noticed between my TR and the Timeform TR, we invariably get the winner. If we both agree on the TR, then it tends to go tits up.
Kins 11.06R.png
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
sniffer66 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 15, 2022 8:59 pmSo, you dutching both when you don't agree ?wearthefoxhat wrote: ↑Fri Jul 15, 2022 11:28 amStill encouraging results going forward. I've noticed between my TR and the Timeform TR, we invariably get the winner. If we both agree on the TR, then it tends to go tits up.
Kins 11.06R.png
That would be one way to go!
Just focussing on the value ones for now if they are rated above the par rating (figure on top of the ratings column). If it matches TF, not normally value anyway.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
For the craic, the Romford 13.02 interests me for different reasons.
Everyone disagrees on the likely winner. (that's a good thing for value hunting).The racing manager has T2 improving as a rate of knots, double jumping grades (A10 to A6) and pits it against A5 types, dropping in grade and posting improved times. T2 is also a bitch in form (old adage).
My view is T3 should/needs-to get first run and take the race. Ladbrokes put it in at 9/2 early doors.
Everyone disagrees on the likely winner. (that's a good thing for value hunting).The racing manager has T2 improving as a rate of knots, double jumping grades (A10 to A6) and pits it against A5 types, dropping in grade and posting improved times. T2 is also a bitch in form (old adage).
My view is T3 should/needs-to get first run and take the race. Ladbrokes put it in at 9/2 early doors.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
RP got it right. Money came for T3 (9/2 to 11/4). T1 was a poor price @ 11/4!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Could be egg on face with this one.
Both T3 &T1 should get a clean run, reckon T3 should get clear and is set up to do so...with T5 chasing them home. (could benefit if neither T3/T1 trap well)
Both T3 &T1 should get a clean run, reckon T3 should get clear and is set up to do so...with T5 chasing them home. (could benefit if neither T3/T1 trap well)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Got it right, sort of. T3 backed down from 9/2 to 5/2. T5 ran on well and nabbed T3. (T1 was a false favourite)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Run of the mill graded race, but Kinsley is one of the tracks on my short-list.
The timeform comments tend to match the way I see the race. T5 may lose some ground as its' race style isn't suited by the track, despite faster times and being tipped everywhere. The R.M seems to have given T6 (older type-May16) a fair chance, if breaking well.
No early prices on this race.
The timeform comments tend to match the way I see the race. T5 may lose some ground as its' race style isn't suited by the track, despite faster times and being tipped everywhere. The R.M seems to have given T6 (older type-May16) a fair chance, if breaking well.
No early prices on this race.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Another cracking result against the trend.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3247
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
Thought I'd post up a race where RP go NAP on a selection and see if I agree or not.
T2 should get a clean run on the inside with T4 thereabouts, but T2 doesn't look value compared to T4.
T5 might find trouble along with T6.
T2 should get a clean run on the inside with T4 thereabouts, but T2 doesn't look value compared to T4.
T5 might find trouble along with T6.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.