Rather have a Monarchy than a President.
Governments come and go – they can even be toppled – but Monarchy endures. The continuity a Sovereign brings to their country ensures stability through a single figure!
RANT CORNER
-
Realrocknrolla
- Posts: 1910
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2020 7:15 pm
Governments come and go – they can even be toppled – but Monarchy endures. The continuity a Sovereign brings to their country ensures stability through a single figure!
President Johnson, President Truss, President Blair....should I stop now? I think you get my thoughts. A President is at best a figurehead (we've already got one). At worst they are corrupt Nixon, Trump.Realrocknrolla wrote: ↑Wed Sep 14, 2022 4:51 pmRather have a Monarchy than a President.
Governments come and go – they can even be toppled – but Monarchy endures. The continuity a Sovereign brings to their country ensures stability through a single figure!
I prefer our system. Monarchy? Fine so long as noone like Andrew gets the Crown.
Personally, I think Anne is a chip of both blocks. Straight-talking but I believe hard-working and still has her parents sense of duty.
Perhaps. I'd be quite happy with Anne as Queen.
But I would resate the horror os "President Johnson, President Truss, President Blair".
Need I say more?
That's not how a republic works. Johnson/Truss/Blair would still be PM and parliament would wield most of the power. The president would have limited executive powers.
BBC have had it on there red button since she arrived there yesterday afternoon till 6am Monday morning, just in case anyone want to watch each and every person who files past
I bought a pack of bacon for £1.60 and thought to myself, what happened to the pork crisis? Tens of thousands of pigs with no one to slaughter and transport them, there was talk of bacon and sausages doubling in price or even being off the shelves!
