I support Darlington were fan owned in the National League North. We have our financial limitations which makes it difficult to progress back to the football league (renting a ground is the main one) but at least the club is sustainable and no longer susceptible to scrupulous owners who previously have wiped our club off the face of the earth more than once.Kai wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2023 5:19 pmEasy choice for most people I would imagine, a club owned by fans or a state-owned club that is under investigation (yet again)Michael5482 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 12, 2023 8:18 amI much prefer the German ownership model along with there cheap ticket prices. It's what fans should be striving for in England but to much greed
No offense to City fans but City winning stuff just sort of stains that whole competition
Ideally you want to judge teams on merit only, but this is rather difficult these days
I absolutely detest all the media clubs like Wrexham get because a pair of American actors have pumped millions in and it's sold as a fairy story when it's anything but. Salford story was no different when the class of 92 got involved.
There's fan owned clubs who get no media attention but have sustainable models Darlington, Chester, Wimbledon, Chesterfield, Exeter City to name a few but there not vanity projects, proper clubs owned by the fans for the fans but that story doesn't sell papers.