Really could not give a fuck what you or LeTiss thinks. Very reasonable comment I made as well!ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 4:22 pmI'm beginning to think the same as Le Tiss thinks about youDerek27 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 4:14 pmIf there were zero illegal immigration, I suspect you'd be complaining about the levels of legal immigration!ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 3:49 pmMy 'Brave New World' is zero illegal immigration.
Not too much to ask for is it.
What a F*kn twat
The Situation Room
-
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
The problem is you cant deport them if their asylum case fails. There is no returns agreement with France or other EU states. France already said the UK would need to get an agreement with the EU and it wouldn't be possible to get all 28 members to agree as Spain, Italy, Germany and Hungary have all got problems with migrants.CloseBets wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:10 pmWhat on earth is an "illegal immigrant boat"? The people on the boats are asylum seekers, or purporting to be. The only problem with those is that the previous government has created such a backlog of cases to be heard for their own ends to create fear amongst the public. I'd imagine processing their claims will become a priority for the government to either grant asylum or deny and deport. The amount of migrants on those boats has always been negligible in real terms but their political value was always a bonus for the right wing.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 3:02 pm
So all the illegal immigrant boats coming across the English Channel day after day is false rumours ?
So, what do you do, put them on planes to Afghanistan or Syria ?, that would cost a fortune and those countries may well not accept them.
The problem, if you want to call it that, is global and nobody has an answer.
i think you'll find that FFS purports to have an answer!!Archery1969 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:18 pm
So, what do you do, put them on planes to Afghanistan or Syria ?, that would cost a fortune and those countries may well not accept them.
The problem, if you want to call it that, is global and nobody has an answer.

You're a nasty piece of work. You are incapabale of a single coherent sentence to justify your apalling views.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 4:22 pmI'm beginning to think the same as Le Tiss thinks about youDerek27 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 4:14 pmIf there were zero illegal immigration, I suspect you'd be complaining about the levels of legal immigration!ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 3:49 pmMy 'Brave New World' is zero illegal immigration.
Not too much to ask for is it.
What a F*kn twat
Meantime. Asians across the land are in fear. Sod all to do with asylum or illegal immigration. State your case you coward.
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
greenmark wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:09 pmAs you have pointed out. 14 years haven't worked on this issue. You still are not offering a solution just complaining and using the issue to create mayhem.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 3:49 pmMy 'Brave New World' is zero illegal immigration.Exaplain your brave new world
Not too much to ask for is it.
Distance yourself from the violence and I will respect your view.
By stopping all the small boats carrying illegal immigrants from crossing the English ChannelYou still are not offering a solution
How? You catch 'em in the middle of the Channel. Then what? Tow them back to France?ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:34 pmgreenmark wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:09 pmAs you have pointed out. 14 years haven't worked on this issue. You still are not offering a solution just complaining and using the issue to create mayhem.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 3:49 pm
My 'Brave New World' is zero illegal immigration.
Not too much to ask for is it.
Distance yourself from the violence and I will respect your view.By stopping all the small boats carrying illegal immigrants from crossing the English ChannelYou still are not offering a solution
-
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am
The only way you could do that would be to either sink them and/or goto war with the French navy when trying to send them back. Neither of which is going to happen. Basically, there is very little legally that you can do.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:34 pmgreenmark wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:09 pmAs you have pointed out. 14 years haven't worked on this issue. You still are not offering a solution just complaining and using the issue to create mayhem.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 3:49 pm
My 'Brave New World' is zero illegal immigration.
Not too much to ask for is it.
Distance yourself from the violence and I will respect your view.By stopping all the small boats carrying illegal immigrants from crossing the English ChannelYou still are not offering a solution
Hungary has managed to reduce migrants because of the following:
- Its land locked.
- Errecting fences on its borders. Patrolled by armed guards and dogs.
- Issuing fines and/or imprisonment to any person housing an illegal migrant.
- Issuing fines and/or imprisonment to any company hiring an illegal migrant.
- Paying legal citzens to inform on those housing or hiring an illegal migrant.
- Getting a resident permit means you need to pass an Hungarian history test, in Hungarian. Therefore, most cant pass it.
- Issuing fines and/or imprisonment to anyone helping an illegal migrant apply for asylum including filling out forms.
The EU has recently fined Hungary 200 million Euros for breaking EU asylum laws, guidlines and policies.
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
greenmark wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:40 pmHow? You catch 'em in the middle of the Channel. Then what? Tow them back to France?ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:34 pmBy stopping all the small boats carrying illegal immigrants from crossing the English ChannelYou still are not offering a solution
It's above my pay grade. You tell me.How?
Bring the Navy in ?
And Labour don't seem to have any ideas either
( and please don't say they've only been in power for five weeks )
This is there latest plan
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... itain.html
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
greenmark wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:40 pmHow? You catch 'em in the middle of the Channel. Then what? Tow them back to France?ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:34 pmBy stopping all the small boats carrying illegal immigrants from crossing the English ChannelYou still are not offering a solution
It's above my pay grade. You tell me.How?
Bring the Navy in ?
And Labour don't seem to have any ideas either
( and please don't say they've only been in power for five weeks )
This is there latest plan
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... itain.html
When all avenues are closed to them , appeals etc, they can be deported, I'm not talking about returns to a safe country. Between 2010 and 2020 about 40% of failed asylum claim were returned either voluntarily or enforced.Archery1969 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:18 pm
The problem is you cant deport them if their asylum case fails. There is no returns agreement with France or other EU states. France already said the UK would need to get an agreement with the EU and it wouldn't be possible to get all 28 members to agree as Spain, Italy, Germany and Hungary have all got problems with migrants.
So, what do you do, put them on planes to Afghanistan or Syria ?, that would cost a fortune and those countries may well not accept them.
The problem, if you want to call it that, is global and nobody has an answer.
"In the year ending 30 September 2023, the top nationalities among those returned were Albanian (20%), Indian (15%), and Brazilian (12%)"
The majority of people coming from Syria, Afghanistan etc are genuine asylum seekers, many have left more more behind than they'll be given by the UK government. There's no denying there are economic migrants but the sooner asylum claims are dealt with the better for everyone , freeing asylum seekers to earn their way rather than simply rely on handouts which only reinforces the notion for some they're only here for benefits..
Absolute masterstroke!!!ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:53 pmgreenmark wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:40 pmHow? You catch 'em in the middle of the Channel. Then what? Tow them back to France?ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:34 pm
By stopping all the small boats carrying illegal immigrants from crossing the English ChannelIt's above my pay grade. You tell me.How?
Bring the Navy in ?
And Labour don't seem to have any ideas either
( and please don't say they've only been in power for five weeks )
This is there latest plan
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... itain.html
You've certainly found the solution to immigration, that is, stopping the small boats. Just short of the minor detail of how to do it.



-
- Posts: 1606
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
Progress... You have agreed you have not a clue.
Next question: How does encouraging people to riot help?
Derek27 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 6:00 pmAbsolute masterstroke!!!ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:53 pmIt's above my pay grade. You tell me.How?
Bring the Navy in ?
And Labour don't seem to have any ideas either
( and please don't say they've only been in power for five weeks )
This is there latest plan
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... itain.html
You've certainly found the solution to immigration, that is, stopping the small boats. Just short of the minor detail of how to do it.![]()
![]()
![]()

Not bad for a twat like me.greenmark wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 6:09 pmDerek27 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 6:00 pmAbsolute masterstroke!!!ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:53 pm
It's above my pay grade. You tell me.
Bring the Navy in ?
And Labour don't seem to have any ideas either
( and please don't say they've only been in power for five weeks )
This is there latest plan
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... itain.html
You've certainly found the solution to immigration, that is, stopping the small boats. Just short of the minor detail of how to do it.![]()
![]()
![]()
nearly choked on that one.

58-year-old man jailed for three years. He told the court he lost his job, let down his kids and is ashamed of himself. Great, but you'd expect those words to come from a much younger man, not someone with 58 years of life experience!
For a younger man, his rep told the court he's not very clever and doesn't know the difference between far-left and far-right. That is brilliant, add insult and humiliation to the punishment.
For a younger man, his rep told the court he's not very clever and doesn't know the difference between far-left and far-right. That is brilliant, add insult and humiliation to the punishment.

Last edited by Derek27 on Thu Aug 08, 2024 9:12 am, edited 1 time in total.