Excuses, Excuses, Excuses

Betfair trading & Punting on politics. Be aware there is a lot of off topic discussion in this group centred on Political views.
Post Reply
Michael5482
Posts: 1693
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 8:11 pm

greenmark wrote:
Wed Dec 04, 2024 7:42 pm
firlandsfarm wrote:
Wed Dec 04, 2024 5:16 pm
ForFolksSake wrote:
Tue Dec 03, 2024 3:03 pm
But fom an English tomato lover's point of view I think we should make Lefty Luvvies in this country pay 50% Income Tax and every body else 20%
Amen to that FFS ... they should pay for the cost of their woke luvviness. The current position of "I have an idea and you 60 million are going to pay for it" is as unfair (from a pure democracy point of view) as the FPTP electoral system!

Luv it :lol: :lol: :lol:
Define a lefty, define a luvvie then get that thru parliament.
You were silent while the Tories ruined our country. Now we can't shut you up. You are appaling hypocrites.
I find most of the left slightly hypocritical in general and don't have to dig too deep to find it. For example they stand for social equality and it's a noble cause but to deliver that they have to apply positive discrimination in an attempt to engineer it. Positive discrimination is a word the left manufactured to disguise their racism because that's what positive discrimination is its racism, it's discrimination, it's bigoted and I find it intolerable.

Personally I believe in meritocracy, the issue is providing the opportunity to people to be judged on merit that's where the centre and centre right have failed opening the door to the idiots like Labour to carry out their completely flawed social experiment on social equality because that's what there are doing and it's f@cked up logic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zkL91LzCMc
greenmark
Posts: 6265
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:15 pm

Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 9:46 am
greenmark wrote:
Wed Dec 04, 2024 7:42 pm
firlandsfarm wrote:
Wed Dec 04, 2024 5:16 pm

Amen to that FFS ... they should pay for the cost of their woke luvviness. The current position of "I have an idea and you 60 million are going to pay for it" is as unfair (from a pure democracy point of view) as the FPTP electoral system!

Luv it :lol: :lol: :lol:
Define a lefty, define a luvvie then get that thru parliament.
You were silent while the Tories ruined our country. Now we can't shut you up. You are appaling hypocrites.
I find most of the left slightly hypocritical in general and don't have to dig too deep to find it. For example they stand for social equality and it's a noble cause but to deliver that they have to apply positive discrimination in an attempt to engineer it. Positive discrimination is a word the left manufactured to disguise their racism because that's what positive discrimination is its racism, it's discrimination, it's bigoted and I find it intolerable.

Personally I believe in meritocracy, the issue is providing the opportunity to people to be judged on merit that's where the centre and centre right have failed opening the door to the idiots like Labour to carry out their completely flawed social experiment on social equality because that's what there are doing and it's f@cked up logic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zkL91LzCMc
Socialism is not a remedy for the world's troubles.
The Nazi's where national socialists. The USSR ie Uinion of Soviet Socialist Republics where about as left wing as Genghis Khan.
Mussolini at least had the decency to be a loud and proud fascist. IMO Hitler, his henchmen, Stalin, Mussolini and all dictators are the same. They wrap themselves in some idealogy but they're all supremely self-centered. Democracy is our only defence.
sionascaig
Posts: 1606
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am

Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 9:46 am

Personally I believe in meritocracy, the issue is providing the opportunity to people to be judged on merit that's where the centre and centre right have failed opening the door to the idiots like Labour to carry out their completely flawed social experiment on social equality because that's what there are doing and it's f@cked up logic.
Yes & No...

When I started work, women didn't qualify for a pension as they were "expected" to go off and have babies, look after a family and the "man" was the main earner.

Opportunities were very limited and to get out of the "typing pool" was an achievement never mind go to Uni and become a professional.

Positive discrimination had its place to bring about change.

Once that is achieved however I would agree with you.

If it is properly targeted I think a case can be argued for it to ensure equal opportunity but should only be temporary.

I do laugh when I see the Royal Family saying they are an equal opportunity employer... I mean you literally have to be born or marry into the family to get all the benefits!
Michael5482
Posts: 1693
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 8:11 pm

greenmark wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 9:58 am
Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 9:46 am
greenmark wrote:
Wed Dec 04, 2024 7:42 pm

Define a lefty, define a luvvie then get that thru parliament.
You were silent while the Tories ruined our country. Now we can't shut you up. You are appaling hypocrites.
I find most of the left slightly hypocritical in general and don't have to dig too deep to find it. For example they stand for social equality and it's a noble cause but to deliver that they have to apply positive discrimination in an attempt to engineer it. Positive discrimination is a word the left manufactured to disguise their racism because that's what positive discrimination is its racism, it's discrimination, it's bigoted and I find it intolerable.

Personally I believe in meritocracy, the issue is providing the opportunity to people to be judged on merit that's where the centre and centre right have failed opening the door to the idiots like Labour to carry out their completely flawed social experiment on social equality because that's what there are doing and it's f@cked up logic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zkL91LzCMc
Socialism is not a remedy for the world's troubles.
The Nazi's where national socialists. The USSR ie Uinion of Soviet Socialist Republics where about as left wing as Genghis Khan.
Mussolini at least had the decency to be a loud and proud fascist. IMO Hitler, his henchmen, Stalin, Mussolini and all dictators are the same. They wrap themselves in some idealogy but they're all supremely self-centered. Democracy is our only defence.
Dictators no matter on the left or right also use democracy or legitimate legal means to get into power before unleashing there dictatorship democracy is no defence at all to think otherwise is pure fallacy.
greenmark
Posts: 6265
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:15 pm

Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 10:14 am
greenmark wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 9:58 am
Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 9:46 am


I find most of the left slightly hypocritical in general and don't have to dig too deep to find it. For example they stand for social equality and it's a noble cause but to deliver that they have to apply positive discrimination in an attempt to engineer it. Positive discrimination is a word the left manufactured to disguise their racism because that's what positive discrimination is its racism, it's discrimination, it's bigoted and I find it intolerable.

Personally I believe in meritocracy, the issue is providing the opportunity to people to be judged on merit that's where the centre and centre right have failed opening the door to the idiots like Labour to carry out their completely flawed social experiment on social equality because that's what there are doing and it's f@cked up logic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zkL91LzCMc
Socialism is not a remedy for the world's troubles.
The Nazi's where national socialists. The USSR ie Uinion of Soviet Socialist Republics where about as left wing as Genghis Khan.
Mussolini at least had the decency to be a loud and proud fascist. IMO Hitler, his henchmen, Stalin, Mussolini and all dictators are the same. They wrap themselves in some idealogy but they're all supremely self-centered. Democracy is our only defence.
Dictators no matter on the left or right also use democracy or legitimate legal means to get into power before unleashing there dictatorship democracy is no defence at all to think otherwise is pure fallacy.
I must disagree.
I accept Hitler came to power partly thru democracy, but it was more due to the fact the German population were desperate for some relief from the poverty imposed by WW1 reparations and an aristocratic hierachy that didn't see (or perhaps turned a blind eye) to Hitler's real intentions.
Democracy is the best system so far. It is being pushed to it's limits these days but the alternative is Trump, Netanyahu, Putin, Assad Hamas, Hezbollah Houti's and the Saudi regime et al.
User avatar
ForFolksSake
Posts: 868
Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm

Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 9:46 am
greenmark wrote:
Wed Dec 04, 2024 7:42 pm
firlandsfarm wrote:
Wed Dec 04, 2024 5:16 pm

Amen to that FFS ... they should pay for the cost of their woke luvviness. The current position of "I have an idea and you 60 million are going to pay for it" is as unfair (from a pure democracy point of view) as the FPTP electoral system!

Luv it :lol: :lol: :lol:
Define a lefty, define a luvvie then get that thru parliament.
You were silent while the Tories ruined our country. Now we can't shut you up. You are appaling hypocrites.
I find most of the left slightly hypocritical in general and don't have to dig too deep to find it. For example they stand for social equality and it's a noble cause but to deliver that they have to apply positive discrimination in an attempt to engineer it. Positive discrimination is a word the left manufactured to disguise their racism because that's what positive discrimination is its racism, it's discrimination, it's bigoted and I find it intolerable.

Personally I believe in meritocracy, the issue is providing the opportunity to people to be judged on merit that's where the centre and centre right have failed opening the door to the idiots like Labour to carry out their completely flawed social experiment on social equality because that's what there are doing and it's f@cked up logic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zkL91LzCMc
Father Ted, oh how we laughed , those days are well gone , thanks to the Lefties

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8Vj4DrhYhk 😂

Absolutely, ridiculous, it was a joke 😲
Michael5482
Posts: 1693
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 8:11 pm

greenmark wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 12:00 pm
Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 10:14 am
greenmark wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 9:58 am

Socialism is not a remedy for the world's troubles.
The Nazi's where national socialists. The USSR ie Uinion of Soviet Socialist Republics where about as left wing as Genghis Khan.
Mussolini at least had the decency to be a loud and proud fascist. IMO Hitler, his henchmen, Stalin, Mussolini and all dictators are the same. They wrap themselves in some idealogy but they're all supremely self-centered. Democracy is our only defence.
Dictators no matter on the left or right also use democracy or legitimate legal means to get into power before unleashing there dictatorship democracy is no defence at all to think otherwise is pure fallacy.
I must disagree.
I accept Hitler came to power partly thru democracy, but it was more due to the fact the German population were desperate for some relief from the poverty imposed by WW1 reparations and an aristocratic hierachy that didn't see (or perhaps turned a blind eye) to Hitler's real intentions.
Democracy is the best system so far. It is being pushed to it's limits these days but the alternative is Trump, Netanyahu, Putin, Assad Hamas, Hezbollah Houti's and the Saudi regime et al.
Democracy across the world especially in Europe at the moment appears to be a great advert for populism especially to the right of politics (populism on the left isn't worth bothering about basically the BLM, LBQT, Animal Rising f@cktard type people) especially when politicians get democratically elected then don't do or deliver what they promise but they wear a suit instead of a military uniform so it's kind of accepted.

It's little wonder the right especially the far right are on the march across Europe, democratically elected politicians are failing people, I'll say (without any data and a pure guess) poverty being the biggest factor and people see no other option. How long has democracy failed to address child poverty in the UK for example?

I don't think it's difficult to sort out especially in the UK but politicians don't want to face it because it involves going against there personal and political beliefs which may result in loosing power but it's better than doing nothing which the current stance and has been for a long time. I'm right leaning but not far right obviously but it's easy to see why people are attracted to and moving to the right in their droves.

The lefts answer to immigration for example is to call everyone a racist, the lefts answer growth is buy now pay later it's the same old dance to the same old tune. I'd have more respect for the left if they at least put up a fight but they don't even acknowledge it let alone tackle it and that's dangerous, I don't want to see a far right resurgence like the 80s but the left have no answers to populism on the right, they are about to be consumed and spat out by it lets hope it's not the far right. I think the left has gone too far to the left and the right have gone too far to the right and the country is crying out for a sensible centre ground party. The Lib Dems could of filled it that but like I say they're useless one minute there centre, next slightly left leaning next slightly right leaning they are pointless.

If there was a serious centrist party with common sense policy worth any salt I'd probably vote for it but I could never vote for a left leaning party and more attracted by the right due to things like meritocracy and personal responsibility.
Michael5482
Posts: 1693
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 8:11 pm

Released by the Government today

07/08 to 24 , 440,788 non-UK 'lead tenants' have accessed new social housing lettings
2023/2024, there were 33,075 non-UK lead tenants accessing new social housing lettings

wtf is going on here no foreign national should have any access to any social housing. Britain is just an international hotel and healthcare system with British people who can't access it in a timely manor or access it all paying for it.

Anyway it settles a long standing argument down the boozer with the local lefty who's claimed foreign nationals don't qualify for social housing, hope he's out this weekend in the snooker room :lol:
User avatar
ForFolksSake
Posts: 868
Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm

Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 2:12 pm
Released by the Government today

07/08 to 24 , 440,788 non-UK 'lead tenants' have accessed new social housing lettings
2023/2024, there were 33,075 non-UK lead tenants accessing new social housing lettings

wtf is going on here no foreign national should have any access to any social housing. Britain is just an international hotel and healthcare system with British people who can't access it in a timely manor or access it all paying for it.

Anyway it settles a long standing argument down the boozer with the local lefty who's claimed foreign nationals don't qualify for social housing, hope he's out this weekend in the snooker room :lol:
Scandalous.😲

"Plenty Of Room At The Hotel California"...
"Living It Up At The Hotel California'....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09839DpTctU

p.s - R.I.P Terry Griffiths
sionascaig
Posts: 1606
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am

Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 2:12 pm

Anyway it settles a long standing argument down the boozer with the local lefty who's claimed foreign nationals don't qualify for social housing, hope he's out this weekend in the snooker room :lol:
Not sure it does...
Screenshot 2024-12-05 165314.png
Screenshot 2024-12-05 165423.png
Each council has own rules however...

edit - they are probably mainly from UK resettlement schemes (which qualify for social housing)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by sionascaig on Thu Dec 05, 2024 4:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Archery1969
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am

One of my mates back in the UK has sent a letter to No10, asking where he can get a big enough dinghy from to carry him and his family over to France.

🤣

What a muppet.

😂
Michael5482
Posts: 1693
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 8:11 pm

sionascaig wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 4:55 pm
Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 2:12 pm

Anyway it settles a long standing argument down the boozer with the local lefty who's claimed foreign nationals don't qualify for social housing, hope he's out this weekend in the snooker room :lol:
Not sure it does...

Screenshot 2024-12-05 165314.png

Screenshot 2024-12-05 165423.png

Each council has own rules however...

edit - they are probably mainly from UK resettlement schemes (which qualify for social housing)
Re-settlement schemes are for foreign nationals, having a quick look re-settlement schemes only started in 2021 when they opened it up to the full world by the looks of it
sionascaig
Posts: 1606
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am

Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 8:03 pm
sionascaig wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 4:55 pm
Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 2:12 pm

Anyway it settles a long standing argument down the boozer with the local lefty who's claimed foreign nationals don't qualify for social housing, hope he's out this weekend in the snooker room :lol:
Not sure it does...

Screenshot 2024-12-05 165314.png

Screenshot 2024-12-05 165423.png

Each council has own rules however...

edit - they are probably mainly from UK resettlement schemes (which qualify for social housing)
Re-settlement schemes are for foreign nationals, having a quick look re-settlement schemes only started in 2021 when they opened it up to the full world by the looks of it
Good spot... Does seem very high alright given the apparent restrictions...
Michael5482
Posts: 1693
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 8:11 pm

sionascaig wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 8:15 pm
Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 8:03 pm
sionascaig wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 4:55 pm


Not sure it does...

Screenshot 2024-12-05 165314.png

Screenshot 2024-12-05 165423.png

Each council has own rules however...

edit - they are probably mainly from UK resettlement schemes (which qualify for social housing)
Re-settlement schemes are for foreign nationals, having a quick look re-settlement schemes only started in 2021 when they opened it up to the full world by the looks of it
Good spot... Does seem very high alright given the apparent restrictions...
I don't think they can dress it up anymore they've literally opened up our borders, threw all the control measures in the bin and then spent billions on it and said nothing to see here while calling everyone a racist who questioned it. Labour started it and the Tory's accelerated it at warp speed, neither party has never had a mandate to do so, good old democracy.

Reform UK are now pushing for all the Universal Credit numbers now by the looks of it, they have requested immigration/foreign national housing/benefit data across the board that Government have never published to the public. What has been published so far it would appear not many immigrants are working they appear to be in publicly funded council houses/hotels and on benefits.

Basically what the racists who questioned how their tax was being spent have been saying for years appears to be true.
Archery1969
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:25 am

Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 8:52 pm
sionascaig wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 8:15 pm
Michael5482 wrote:
Thu Dec 05, 2024 8:03 pm


Re-settlement schemes are for foreign nationals, having a quick look re-settlement schemes only started in 2021 when they opened it up to the full world by the looks of it
Good spot... Does seem very high alright given the apparent restrictions...
I don't think they can dress it up anymore they've literally opened up our borders, threw all the control measures in the bin and then spent billions on it and said nothing to see here while calling everyone a racist who questioned it. Labour started it and the Tory's accelerated it at warp speed, neither party has never had a mandate to do so, good old democracy.

Reform UK are now pushing for all the Universal Credit numbers now by the looks of it, they have requested immigration/foreign national housing/benefit data across the board that Government have never published to the public. What has been published so far it would appear not many immigrants are working they appear to be in publicly funded council houses/hotels and on benefits.

Basically what the racists who questioned how their tax was being spent have been saying for years appears to be true.
If true then Starmer and Labour will be gone next GE.

But can you imagine Nigel becoming PM. The UK would become more divided than ever. They wouldn’t need to worry about immigration as millions would be on the coast looking for a dinghy.

🤣
Post Reply

Return to “Political betting & arguing”