Building First Tennis Bot - Lay First Set Winner - Help/Advice?

User avatar
Dallas
Posts: 23576
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:57 pm

kikiwillmo88 wrote:
Sun Aug 17, 2025 4:21 pm
Yes I think I followed the instructions correctly. See screenshot below

TennisFixedscore2.jpg

I've ticked that box for the log.

Here is the BOT If you want to see if I've done anything wrong.
That looks fine to me, but I's still recommend ticking the 'Write the contents to the Bet Angel log', box at the bottom of the Stored value tab while testing

One other condition to add to your back bet2 rule which I forgot about to ensure the 60% of the split is placed on the 2nd set winner is to add a 'Tennis Completed Set' Condition to test the selection won the previous set
kikiwillmo88
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

Thanks for this and all your help. Had it running between practise and real mode and almost working perfectly.

I think Ive done the condition correctly. However am I right in thinking this won't trigger if there is a tie break in the second? There was no option on the drop down for '1 game or more or tie break'. How would this be solved?



Thanks
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
kikiwillmo88
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

Dallas wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 10:51 am
kikiwillmo88 wrote:
Sun Aug 17, 2025 4:21 pm


One other condition to add to your back bet2 rule which I forgot about to ensure the 60% of the split is placed on the 2nd set winner is to add a 'Tennis Completed Set' Condition to test the selection won the previous set
Seems to still be struggling to skew the profits 60/40 if you see the below? Seems to be hedging still...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Dallas
Posts: 23576
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:57 pm

kikiwillmo88 wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:04 pm
Thanks for this and all your help. Had it running between practise and real mode and almost working perfectly.

I think Ive done the condition correctly. However am I right in thinking this won't trigger if there is a tie break in the second? There was no option on the drop down for '1 game or more or tie break'. How would this be solved?



Thanks
The tie break won't matter, as the player would have still won the set by one or more games ie, 7-6 or 6-7
User avatar
Dallas
Posts: 23576
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:57 pm

kikiwillmo88 wrote:
Mon Aug 18, 2025 4:04 pm
Thanks for this and all your help. Had it running between practise and real mode and almost working perfectly.

I think Ive done the condition correctly. However am I right in thinking this won't trigger if there is a tie break in the second? There was no option on the drop down for '1 game or more or tie break'. How would this be solved?



Thanks
So a few more edits to make

1) On your 'Close if Win Set' set rule
Go onto the Signal tab and set a signal on the market with a name of your choice (ie, delay), the value can be left as 1

2) Then on your 'Set/Modify Stored Value rule
Add a 'Signal Changed condition to test the signal named 'Delay' (or whatever you called it changed between 20 secs and 30secs ago

*That will ensure your green up rule has a chance to trigger and be matched at least twice and before the P/L is stored*

3) Also on that same 'Set/Modify Stored Value rule
Go onto the Stored Value tab and change the following
for Nominated Selection
to
For Current Selection

*I don't think this should matter but setting it as above would be better*

Then give that ago
kikiwillmo88
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

Thanks for this.

Think I have followed correctly below. Testing it now.
Screenshot 2025-08-19 at 12.30.16.png
Set&Modify.png
Screenshot 2025-08-19 at 12.30.41.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
kikiwillmo88
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

Following those changes it seems to have caused an issue where the lay is placed on the set one winner and the back of 100 is placed on the loser at the same time? See attached.
Doublebet.png

Also the log
Screenshot 2025-08-19 at 13.08.46.png
It then closed both out for the 30 loss during set 2. However the 100 back bet is designed to come into play if the lay odds are higher then 1.55 on the set 1 winner. Which they weren't. Think I must have done something wrong in the changes above.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
kikiwillmo88
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

There seems to have been no repeat of the back and lay placement.

However with the amendments it is still struggling to do any kind of 60/40 skewing...
Noskew.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Dallas
Posts: 23576
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:57 pm

kikiwillmo88 wrote:
Tue Aug 19, 2025 1:06 pm
Following those changes it seems to have caused an issue where the lay is placed on the set one winner and the back of 100 is placed on the loser at the same time? See attached.

Doublebet.png


Also the log

Screenshot 2025-08-19 at 13.08.46.png

It then closed both out for the 30 loss during set 2. However the 100 back bet is designed to come into play if the lay odds are higher then 1.55 on the set 1 winner. Which they weren't. Think I must have done something wrong in the changes above.
Those bets are caused your original back and lay bets, none of the rules added or edited since the start of this thread
I assumed you had those triggering correctly already
User avatar
Dallas
Posts: 23576
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:57 pm

kikiwillmo88 wrote:
Tue Aug 19, 2025 2:36 pm
There seems to have been no repeat of the back and lay placement.

However with the amendments it is still struggling to do any kind of 60/40 skewing...

Noskew.png
Can you post a screenshot of the log? the first thing we need to know is that the SV rule triggered at the right time to capture the greened up profit and what stake it calculated from it
Also the Automation tab below the bottom window as that will provide the times the rules last triggered and by comparing them to the log the problem should be easy to spot
kikiwillmo88
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2024 11:10 am

The Back & Lay triggering was the first time that ever happened. Had been fine on about 50 markets and hasn't happened on 4 other markets today. So I'm not sure why it happened. Possibly a glitch? It closed out the bets when the drawdown was hit any way.

Here is the log (IGNORE THE 10 back on Stefanos, I created a separate bot that placed this on set 2 winner until we sorted the 60/40 skew).
Log.png
Here is the automation tab -
Automation Tab.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Dallas
Posts: 23576
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:57 pm

kikiwillmo88 wrote:
Tue Aug 19, 2025 3:33 pm
The Back & Lay triggering was the first time that ever happened. Had been fine on about 50 markets and hasn't happened on 4 other markets today. So I'm not sure why it happened. Possibly a glitch? It closed out the bets when the drawdown was hit any way.

Here is the log (IGNORE THE 10 back on Stefanos, I created a separate bot that placed this on set 2 winner until we sorted the 60/40 skew). Log.png

Here is the automation tab - Automation Tab.png
OK so I can see where the mistake is now. On the Stored value you have the adjustment set at minus 'an entered amount' 90
It should be minus a 'percentage' 90

If you look at the log when the SV rule is triggering its deducting 90 from your Profit which is then giving you a negative figure, therefore the 'back bet 2' rule can't place a bet as the value is below zero
Post Reply

Return to “Bet Angel Automation - Tennis”