Reform UK will get more than 50% of the vote at the next election - make Britain Great againstaker72 wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 3:47 pmProportional representation is probably the worst type of electoral system as you end up with some form of grouping system with a pool of candidates and a percentage getting elected via some formulae or party decision over who gets in. With the current system it maintains the concept that you are voting for an individual and your MP answers to that constituency.
What potentially would be better would be a single (transferrable) vote where you put 1st, 2nd and third choices. That way whoever gets elected would have at least the support of 50% of the electorate. However I strongly suspect the government will increase the deposit by the next general election which will likely filter out the minor parties that tend to lose their deposit.
Excuses, Excuses, Excuses
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 907
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
Last edited by ForFolksSake on Tue May 20, 2025 8:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3355
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
So you (and Jim) don't believe in a government that represents the people! Good to know. And since when had my MP answered to our community, she's more interested in summer fete photo ops.staker72 wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 3:47 pmProportional representation is probably the worst type of electoral system as you end up with some form of grouping system with a pool of candidates and a percentage getting elected via some formulae or party decision over who gets in. With the current system it maintains the concept that you are voting for an individual and your MP answers to that constituency.
What potentially would be better would be a single (transferrable) vote where you put 1st, 2nd and third choices. That way whoever gets elected would have at least the support of 50% of the electorate. However I strongly suspect the government will increase the deposit by the next general election which will likely filter out the minor parties that tend to lose their deposit.
As for increased deposits I could find argument either way but would be pleased to see Reform would lose few.
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3355
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
Wow, 1200 illegal immigrants in one day ... I fear to think how many it would have been if we hadn't smashed the gangs!
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 907
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
I'm doing my bit for King and Country - I'm heading the other way and saving a 'SMASHING BOATLOAD' of taXfirlandsfarm wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 7:20 amWow, 1200 illegal immigrants in one day ... I fear to think how many it would have been if we hadn't smashed the gangs!
... THE TAXMANS TAKEN ALL MY DOUGH .... LAZING ON A SUNNY AFTERNOON

- jamesedwards
- Posts: 4305
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:16 pm
John Healey blames the Tories.firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 7:20 amWow, 1200 illegal immigrants in one day ... I fear to think how many it would have been if we hadn't smashed the gangs!

- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 907
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
... three senior judges today will rule on whether to overturn a temporary injunction, which is set to block asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex.
Elon Musk, branding lawyers representing the Home Office as "a government against its people"
Elon Musk, branding lawyers representing the Home Office as "a government against its people"
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3355
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
Well he is right and it is clearly so ... the will of the people is a resounding NO but the Government seek to place the rights of law breaking illegal immigrants above that of the people.ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Fri Aug 29, 2025 11:07 am... three senior judges today will rule on whether to overturn a temporary injunction, which is set to block asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex.
Elon Musk, branding lawyers representing the Home Office as "a government against its people"
And we had another example of the utter hypocrisy of this Government yesterday. Labour MPs scream and shout against people who 'game the rules' to save tax but not when it's one of their own ... even if it's a Deputy PM. Apparently it's OK for the second most senior MP in the country to manipulate within the rules but not others. Let me be clear, she has not broken any rules and I actually applaud her for making such arrangements, it was my job for part of my career to advise people on such moves ... what I against is don't criticise others for doing what you are doing yourself.
-
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
Really need some perspective:ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Fri Aug 29, 2025 11:07 am... three senior judges today will rule on whether to overturn a temporary injunction, which is set to block asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex.
Elon Musk, branding lawyers representing the Home Office as "a government against its people"
Still struggle to see why all this outrage over a relatively small number of "illegals" (of which the majority get allowed in anyway when asylum claim processed..
Would it not be much simpler to set up a centre to process them in France?
That would:
- undermine the gangs business model
- save life's
- save money
- no excuse to use a boat, so can be shipped right back for due processing in France
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3355
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
So if only a small number of a crime are committed it's OK to not bother to police it then?sionascaig wrote: ↑Fri Aug 29, 2025 11:51 amStill struggle to see why all this outrage over a relatively small number of "illegals" (of which the majority get allowed in anyway when asylum claim processed..
Would it not be much simpler to set up a centre to process them in France?
And processing them in France will not work. If allowed to cross to the UK they will but if refused they will just go to the beaches and jump on a boat! It's one of those solutions that has not been thought through in practice.
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 907
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
sionascaig wrote: ↑Fri Aug 29, 2025 11:51 amReally need some perspective:ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Fri Aug 29, 2025 11:07 am... three senior judges today will rule on whether to overturn a temporary injunction, which is set to block asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex.
Elon Musk, branding lawyers representing the Home Office as "a government against its people"
Screenshot 2025-08-29 113835.png
Still struggle to see why all this outrage over a relatively small number of "illegals" (of which the majority get allowed in anyway when asylum claim processed..
Would it not be much simpler to set up a centre to process them in France?
That would:
- undermine the gangs business model
- save life's
- save money
- no excuse to use a boat, so can be shipped right back for due processing in France
Only thing that would work is putting rolls of barbed wire all the way along the French coastline bordering the English channelWould it not be much simpler to set up a centre to process them in France?
https://www.ukposters.co.uk/border-fenc ... ZvYsILLI1o
Last edited by ForFolksSake on Fri Aug 29, 2025 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- firlandsfarm
- Posts: 3355
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am
So if only a small number of a crime are committed it's OK to not bother to police it then?sionascaig wrote: ↑Fri Aug 29, 2025 11:51 amStill struggle to see why all this outrage over a relatively small number of "illegals" (of which the majority get allowed in anyway when asylum claim processed..
Would it not be much simpler to set up a centre to process them in France?
And processing them in France will not work. If allowed to cross to the UK they will but if refused they will just go to the beaches and jump on a boat and France can (will) still refuse to take them back! It's one of those solutions that has not been thought through in practice.
-
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:38 am
I didn't say that as well you know )firlandsfarm wrote: ↑Fri Aug 29, 2025 12:32 pmSo if only a small number of a crime are committed it's OK to not bother to police it then?sionascaig wrote: ↑Fri Aug 29, 2025 11:51 amStill struggle to see why all this outrage over a relatively small number of "illegals" (of which the majority get allowed in anyway when asylum claim processed..
Would it not be much simpler to set up a centre to process them in France?
I would rather the gov focused more on "illegal" drugs & real criminals.
And by a strange co-incidence (talking about criminals) the majority (60%) of those arrested recently protesting about "migration" had domestic abuse convictions and a significant number had in their possession drugs or were high on...
Would be up for deporting that lot to St Helena for some re-education.
But to cut a long story short, I don't have a solution but Farage & the Daily Mail certainly don't have one either !
Peace be with you...
- ForFolksSake
- Posts: 907
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2024 2:51 pm
Let's give priority to the illegal Van dwellers over the illegal immigrants and put them up in hotels as well while we are at it
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cqjyx4kjdd0o.amp
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cqjyx4kjdd0o.amp
- wearthefoxhat
- Posts: 3586
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am
There is a UK maritime law that exists, that any unauthorised boat entering UK waters, can be intercepted and returned to the nearest safe harbour, (push back- France) However, the UK tried exploring “pushback” tactics in 2021–22, but legal advice was that it risked breaching both international maritime law and human rights obligations.sionascaig wrote: ↑Fri Aug 29, 2025 11:51 amReally need some perspective:ForFolksSake wrote: ↑Fri Aug 29, 2025 11:07 am... three senior judges today will rule on whether to overturn a temporary injunction, which is set to block asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex.
Elon Musk, branding lawyers representing the Home Office as "a government against its people"
Would it not be much simpler to set up a centre to process them in France?
That would:
- undermine the gangs business model
- save life's
- save money
- no excuse to use a boat, so can be shipped right back for due processing in France
Reform have touted they would "rip up" human rights laws, which may indicate the above might be on their to-do list.
Processing centres, with a bi-lateral agreement with UK and France, would work too. This would likely get France to wake up and block the routes that the criminal gangs currently exploit. As soon as the other countries realise there is a push-back policy in place, they won't want their security put at risk, so will take the situation a little more seriously than they are at the moment.