Multiple In-play Trader Screens for Multiple Markets

[Tuco]

When you right click a market added to the Guardian you have several market display options, but two very useful options not currently available are:

"Display market on the Bet Angel In-play Trader screen"
"Display market in a new Bet Angel In-play Trader screen"

These would be most welcome and useful additions so one could have a screen set-up for multiple In-play Trader screens for multiple markets.

Please consider for the next update. Thanking you as always BA

[Tuco]

I still think being able to add/spawn additional 'In-play trader' screens would be a good idea in the same way as we can already now spawn the 'One-click' and 'Ladder' screens multiple times.

Ideally it should be possible to spawn additional 'In-play Trader' screens on their own, but as they are already linked in the software to the 'One-click screen', perhaps additional in-play trader screens could be spawned off an already spawned 'One-click screen' to make things easier to begin with?

Q) When might you want to use several In-play Trader screens?
A) In an event with a large number of selections and with multiple markets across the event active at the very same time.

Examples:

Formula 1 races have 20 selections (drivers) with 7 separate markets, plus one more smaller market all active at the very same time during the race.

The Eurovison Song Contest each year has 37-42 selections (singers) with 9 separate markets, plus several other smaller selection markets all active at the very same time during the contest.

The Grand National has 34 selections (riders) and at least 3 separate markets t all active at the very same time during the race.

MAKE THE IN-PLAY TRADER GREAT AGAIN!

[sionascaig]

+1

[Tuco]

Add these spawned In-play Trader screens and my other In-play Trader suggestions which can be seen at

viewtopic.php?t=23176&sid=ec14ff94a0c1f ... 29f91dcfc3

...and "THE IN-PLAY TRADER SCREEN WILL BE GREAT AGAIN!"

[Tuco]

...shame - suggestion not added to v1.63.0 beta1

[ODPaul82]

...shame - suggestion not added to v1.63.0 beta1

Is there any particular reason for so many "shame" messages when the BA developer is doing an amazing job as it is
Peter has always been clear that the profits from BetAngel are re-invested into the development but as far as I'm aware there isn't a full-time team of developers.

We all have a wish-list of stuff we'd like but guess what princess, Santa doesn't always deliver.
In my view the dev(s) are doing a brilliant job and a bit of respect rather than multiple "shame this" and "shame that" would go a long way.

Thank you BetAngel devs for everything you've delivered to date and for what will come.

[Tuco]

...shame - suggestion not added to v1.63.0 beta1

Is there any particular reason for so many "shame" messages

In the past many of my suggestions have been implemented in updates to help BA evolve and improve for one and all, but less so recently.

My recent suggestions are simply a continuation of the same effort to help BA evolve and improve, so by re-highlighting these suggestions, other users like yourself can have their say as to whether any of these suggestions are also of interest to them. That's all Paul.

[ODPaul82]

...shame - suggestion not added to v1.63.0 beta1

In the past many of my suggestions have been implemented in updates to help BA evolve and improve for one and all, but less so recently.

My recent suggestions are simply a continuation of the same effort to help BA evolve and improve, so by re-highlighting these suggestions, other users like yourself can have their say as to whether any of these suggestions are also of interest to them. That's all Paul.

I get that, my response was from me being a developer myself and seeing multiple "shame" messages across multiple messages would make me consider pushing them to the end of the queue.
We all want to see every thing on our wishlists, but it is highly likely one person doing all the development.
I apologise as well for calling you a princess, it's my day off, wine talking.

Wish you the best

[Tuco]

At no time was I or am I criticising the work the BA development team do in any way - they cannot please everyone's wishlist and will have to make decisions based on need, cost and difficulty amongst other considerations.

If implemented, would 'multiple spawned In-play trader screens for multiple markets' (as we can currently do with both the One-click and Ladder screens), be a feature that would be of any future use to you Paul?

[ODPaul82]

If implemented, would 'multiple spawned In-play trader screens for multiple markets' (as we can currently do with both the One-click and Ladder screens), be a feature that would be of any future use to you Paul?

At this present moment in time, no

I'm able to 100% automate my greyhound bot with what has been made available to date
Football I can do with two rules and use the API for what I need to with my own developed tool (I would like a correct score feed directly rather than having to go via a different API)
Tennis I purely do manually with audio alerts as automation doesn't tell me if a player is injured or not.

I am looking at horse data, and working within the realms of what I have available. But I realize all of my wantings may not come to pass.
What has been made available to date where BetAngel do not take profit from the tool itself is brilliant.

Do you believe you are getting value for money where all profit is invested in the development of the tool?

[Tuco]

What has been made available to date where BetAngel do not take profit from the tool itself is brilliant.

Yes it is.

Do you believe you are getting value for money where all profit is invested in the development of the tool?

Yes I do.

I signed up to BA in 2009 and have enjoyed the software and it's evolution immensely ever since. That's also the reason I'm passionate at trying to help ever improve the software with thought out development suggestions that moving forward, if implemented, I would certainly find useful as I'm sure others would too.

[ODPaul82]

I signed up to BA in 2009 and have enjoyed the software and it's evolution immensely ever since. That's also the reason I'm passionate at trying to help ever improve the software with thought out development suggestions that moving forward, if implemented, I would certainly find useful.

Then I take this mild disagreement over
I apologise with the way I have come across profusely, I have a developer head on a lot of the time as where I operate from is the automation realm for a lot of my items and what has been made available to date exceeds massively other applications. Like yourself I've used for a similar number of years (believe 2007 initial date).

My head was in the defense of the developer(s) and there was no harm meant, we are all after the same objective.

[Tuco]

I apologise with the way I have come across profusely

Thank you, but you need not apologise Paul. However I should for my numerous 'suggestions re-highlighting messages'.

I'm grateful for your response and input.

there was no harm meant

...none was taken

we are all after the same objective

Exactly!