Hello Gazuty,
so many thanks for your help.
Is possible that still help me if I have another ideas ?
Another question, where your learn so good to program a bot, because I read the manual and about guardian boot programming is poor.
I learn much more to check what you have do and how you have put the parameters.
Have you a another manual ?
And again many thanks.
Best Regards.
porto
Correct Score Scalping BOT !
-
spreadbetting
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:06 pm
I'm sure they're all adults and can make their own minds up , mugsgame. Is there any reason other than self-righteousness for calling other users idiots/morons just because their ideas differ to yours? Might be time to leave them to it.
I don't like creating conflict and so in many ways I wish I'd not posted this example bot. I did it to help show what can easily be done in automation. I don't personally believe the strategy itself has merit and made that clear at the time of putting it up.
@Porto - the long story - I learned to program on a ZX80 in 1981. My school purchased one. Then I used to cycle half an hour to the local library each Saturday to book my slot to use the IBM compatible. Ah, the 5 1/4 in floppy's. And then there would be a stuff up and it would get damaged in my bag and I'd have to start all over again. Then, when I was about 14 we got a Dick Smith Wizard for Christmas. A combo game console and BASIC programmable computer. Followed a couple of years later by a Commodore 128 for my birthday.
Unfortunately most of my programming was in BASIC and many moons ago. Even studying for a maths degree at university we never got more advanced than programming in Fortran 77.
Anyway, I don't consider betangel automation programming as such.
I got my son a Raspberry Pi for Christmas so we can get into some hobby programming together using Python.
I've always been fortunate that all mathematical and computer logic made perfect sense to me. That doesn't mean I always get it right, just that my brain works the same way as mathematical problems.
@Porto - the long story - I learned to program on a ZX80 in 1981. My school purchased one. Then I used to cycle half an hour to the local library each Saturday to book my slot to use the IBM compatible. Ah, the 5 1/4 in floppy's. And then there would be a stuff up and it would get damaged in my bag and I'd have to start all over again. Then, when I was about 14 we got a Dick Smith Wizard for Christmas. A combo game console and BASIC programmable computer. Followed a couple of years later by a Commodore 128 for my birthday.
Unfortunately most of my programming was in BASIC and many moons ago. Even studying for a maths degree at university we never got more advanced than programming in Fortran 77.
Anyway, I don't consider betangel automation programming as such.
I got my son a Raspberry Pi for Christmas so we can get into some hobby programming together using Python.
I've always been fortunate that all mathematical and computer logic made perfect sense to me. That doesn't mean I always get it right, just that my brain works the same way as mathematical problems.
gazuty, dont you think its a shame you have to sort of apologise for helping someone in "THEIR" quest.
I think its been very kind of you. To me the people who should be apologising are the oh so smug know it alls who cannot just say, my experience tells me its not worth pursuing in a nice way, or give someone a tiny sliver of help, without being nasty.
Which is a bit rich imho as at least one of the nae sayers makes money by beating the suspend, like that qualifies anyone to have an opinion on real strategies that dont involve cheating.
Well done Gazuty,I say.
I think its been very kind of you. To me the people who should be apologising are the oh so smug know it alls who cannot just say, my experience tells me its not worth pursuing in a nice way, or give someone a tiny sliver of help, without being nasty.
Which is a bit rich imho as at least one of the nae sayers makes money by beating the suspend, like that qualifies anyone to have an opinion on real strategies that dont involve cheating.
Well done Gazuty,I say.
I have put up an alternative way to trade this, that does work. I have also contributed countless pieces of advice that all work over the years.haichless wrote:gazuty, dont you think its a shame you have to sort of apologise for helping someone in "THEIR" quest.
I think its been very kind of you. To me the people who should be apologising are the oh so smug know it alls who cannot just say, my experience tells me its not worth pursuing in a nice way, or give someone a tiny sliver of help, without being nasty.
Which is a bit rich imho as at least one of the nae sayers makes money by beating the suspend, like that qualifies anyone to have an opinion on real strategies that dont involve cheating.
Well done Gazuty,I say.
I'd love to hear some pearls of wisdom from you. Why not post your way of making this work?
And in the spirit of Miss Universe, peace and world harmony - @porto and anyone else interested here is a (now slightly more developed) version of mugsgame suggestion to get you started.
(I've modified the attached from the version of this post earlier today after a little live experimentation).
@mugsgame, thanks - this bot has real potential to be developed further and is already bringing home the bacon - you need to choose the right match of course - no person should think they can blindly apply any bot.
Standard disclaimer: may not work as intended, test in practice mode, no person (including me) has any responsibility for any loss.
(I've modified the attached from the version of this post earlier today after a little live experimentation).
@mugsgame, thanks - this bot has real potential to be developed further and is already bringing home the bacon - you need to choose the right match of course - no person should think they can blindly apply any bot.
Standard disclaimer: may not work as intended, test in practice mode, no person (including me) has any responsibility for any loss.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
The absolute key to this working os match profiling.gazuty wrote:And in the spirit of Miss Universe, peace and world harmony - @porto and anyone else interested here is a (now slightly more developed) version of mugsgame suggestion to get you started.
(I've modified the attached from the version of this post earlier today after a little live experimentation).
@mugsgame, thanks - this bot has real potential to be developed further and is already bringing home the bacon - you need to choose the right match of course - no person should think they can blindly apply any bot.
Standard disclaimer: may not work as intended, test in practice mode, no person (including me) has any responsibility for any loss.
You CANNOT use it as a blanket "one size fits all" strategy and expect it to work. I go back to the website I recommended earlier in the post (Betformpro.com). They have a really cool tool that actually lets you see the times of goals scored by each team in many leagues.
In todays manU V Liverpool game. When playing against similar type opposition there have been 6 goals in the first 15 mins in the 20 match sample. This would indicate a 30% chance of a goal in the first 15 mins. Unders is 2.4. At 15 minutes I would expect this to have dropped to around 2. So a back to lay trade at these odds to £100 would net you a green of £20.
So it would take 6 matches to ensure a profit if there is a goal in one of these games if you take a "big picture" long term attitude to this trade. The profiling indicates a goal every 3 matches.
This doesn't take into account the trade out price after 1 goal, so you wouldn't have a total loss of stake. However, I wanted to show that this may not be the best match to do this on and give a clue into profiling. If you are at all interested in this type of trade you absolutely must use PROFILING of some sort.