Today's Horse Racing
-
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:00 am
yes peter it is dire,,,slow markets today...
How can a horse or any selection in a market trade at 1.05 prior to the start ?
Utter madness for anyone backing it at those odds, always a lay bet regardless.
Sounds like something very wrong about this race. Probably warrants an investigation by the bettering authorities.
Utter madness for anyone backing it at those odds, always a lay bet regardless.
Sounds like something very wrong about this race. Probably warrants an investigation by the bettering authorities.
-
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:28 am
2.2 of 2.3 mil traded on Triple Dip. The race before (i think) was also a 1.01 loser so someone must have lost some serious cash over them two races.LeTiss 4pm wrote:2.30 Lingfield - Triple Dip
Some serious money spunked on that fella
There can't be too many horses trading at 1.05 pre-race that loses
If you won money on that race then well done.
But I would withdraw your winnings quickly as I am sure BF will investigate it and potentially reverse bets made.
Looked like someone trying to wash money on the exchange minus commission!!!

But I would withdraw your winnings quickly as I am sure BF will investigate it and potentially reverse bets made.
Looked like someone trying to wash money on the exchange minus commission!!!

-
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
If the actual odds of it winning were 1.01 it would be a great bet. No different in principle to backing a horse who's chance of winning is 10.0 but getting 15.0 for example.cybernet69 wrote:How can a horse or any selection in a market trade at 1.05 prior to the start ?
Utter madness for anyone backing it at those odds, always a lay bet regardless.
If you are a value punter and it was a value back it would be madness to lay it and not back it.
Backing at 1.05 could never be a value bet in any kind of horse racing market prior to the off.
It would be utter madness to do so.
It would be utter madness to do so.
They may never lose but you have to take into account risk/reward otherwise you always run the risk of going bust sooner or later.
Backing a team at 1.05 or lower in play is fine if there is only a 0.01% chance they could lose.
But to risk that type or r:r on a horse prior to the off is just plain stupid.
As today highlighted.
Backing a team at 1.05 or lower in play is fine if there is only a 0.01% chance they could lose.
But to risk that type or r:r on a horse prior to the off is just plain stupid.
As today highlighted.
Following on from my last post.
Since Betfair began, if you had bet every odds on or worse horse then you would be left with a loss overall.
However, backing the favourite before the off who's odds drifted to 20/1 in-play would have produced a positive profit overall.
I would rather risk £20 to win £100 than risk £100 to win £20 or worse return.
Since Betfair began, if you had bet every odds on or worse horse then you would be left with a loss overall.
However, backing the favourite before the off who's odds drifted to 20/1 in-play would have produced a positive profit overall.
I would rather risk £20 to win £100 than risk £100 to win £20 or worse return.