Today's Horse Racing
-
convoysur-2
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:00 am
yes peter it is dire,,,slow markets today...
-
cybernet69
How can a horse or any selection in a market trade at 1.05 prior to the start ?
Utter madness for anyone backing it at those odds, always a lay bet regardless.
Sounds like something very wrong about this race. Probably warrants an investigation by the bettering authorities.
Utter madness for anyone backing it at those odds, always a lay bet regardless.
Sounds like something very wrong about this race. Probably warrants an investigation by the bettering authorities.
-
steven1976
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:28 am
2.2 of 2.3 mil traded on Triple Dip. The race before (i think) was also a 1.01 loser so someone must have lost some serious cash over them two races.LeTiss 4pm wrote:2.30 Lingfield - Triple Dip
Some serious money spunked on that fella
There can't be too many horses trading at 1.05 pre-race that loses
-
cybernet69
If you won money on that race then well done.
But I would withdraw your winnings quickly as I am sure BF will investigate it and potentially reverse bets made.
Looked like someone trying to wash money on the exchange minus commission!!!

But I would withdraw your winnings quickly as I am sure BF will investigate it and potentially reverse bets made.
Looked like someone trying to wash money on the exchange minus commission!!!
-
andyfuller
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
If the actual odds of it winning were 1.01 it would be a great bet. No different in principle to backing a horse who's chance of winning is 10.0 but getting 15.0 for example.cybernet69 wrote:How can a horse or any selection in a market trade at 1.05 prior to the start ?
Utter madness for anyone backing it at those odds, always a lay bet regardless.
If you are a value punter and it was a value back it would be madness to lay it and not back it.
-
cybernet69
Backing at 1.05 could never be a value bet in any kind of horse racing market prior to the off.
It would be utter madness to do so.
It would be utter madness to do so.
-
cybernet69
They may never lose but you have to take into account risk/reward otherwise you always run the risk of going bust sooner or later.
Backing a team at 1.05 or lower in play is fine if there is only a 0.01% chance they could lose.
But to risk that type or r:r on a horse prior to the off is just plain stupid.
As today highlighted.
Backing a team at 1.05 or lower in play is fine if there is only a 0.01% chance they could lose.
But to risk that type or r:r on a horse prior to the off is just plain stupid.
As today highlighted.
-
cybernet69
Following on from my last post.
Since Betfair began, if you had bet every odds on or worse horse then you would be left with a loss overall.
However, backing the favourite before the off who's odds drifted to 20/1 in-play would have produced a positive profit overall.
I would rather risk £20 to win £100 than risk £100 to win £20 or worse return.
Since Betfair began, if you had bet every odds on or worse horse then you would be left with a loss overall.
However, backing the favourite before the off who's odds drifted to 20/1 in-play would have produced a positive profit overall.
I would rather risk £20 to win £100 than risk £100 to win £20 or worse return.
