Today's Horse Racing

The sport of kings.
Post Reply
convoysur-2
Posts: 1110
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:00 am

yes peter it is dire,,,slow markets today...
User avatar
walshy
Posts: 262
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 12:05 am

It felt as though it had a major wobble just before the off at the 4:40 stratford
User avatar
LeTiss
Posts: 5495
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:04 pm

2.30 Lingfield - Triple Dip

Some serious money spunked on that fella

There can't be too many horses trading at 1.05 pre-race that loses
cybernet69

How can a horse or any selection in a market trade at 1.05 prior to the start ?

Utter madness for anyone backing it at those odds, always a lay bet regardless.

Sounds like something very wrong about this race. Probably warrants an investigation by the bettering authorities.
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 26616
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

25-03-2015 - P&L.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
LeTiss
Posts: 5495
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:04 pm

Haha I'm sure for anyone that's done their bollocks Peter, you've just made them feel much better :lol:
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 26616
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

Why would you back something that short that's not proven?
steven1976
Posts: 1744
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:28 am

LeTiss 4pm wrote:2.30 Lingfield - Triple Dip

Some serious money spunked on that fella

There can't be too many horses trading at 1.05 pre-race that loses
2.2 of 2.3 mil traded on Triple Dip. The race before (i think) was also a 1.01 loser so someone must have lost some serious cash over them two races.
cybernet69

If you won money on that race then well done.

But I would withdraw your winnings quickly as I am sure BF will investigate it and potentially reverse bets made.

Looked like someone trying to wash money on the exchange minus commission!!!

:)
andyfuller
Posts: 4619
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm

cybernet69 wrote:How can a horse or any selection in a market trade at 1.05 prior to the start ?

Utter madness for anyone backing it at those odds, always a lay bet regardless.
If the actual odds of it winning were 1.01 it would be a great bet. No different in principle to backing a horse who's chance of winning is 10.0 but getting 15.0 for example.

If you are a value punter and it was a value back it would be madness to lay it and not back it.
cybernet69

Backing at 1.05 could never be a value bet in any kind of horse racing market prior to the off.

It would be utter madness to do so.
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 26616
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

I've seen a horse go off at 1.01 and win.
User avatar
Euler
Posts: 26616
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:39 pm

Thinking about it Black Caviar was a good example, went off loads of times 1.05 or shorter and never lost.
cybernet69

They may never lose but you have to take into account risk/reward otherwise you always run the risk of going bust sooner or later.

Backing a team at 1.05 or lower in play is fine if there is only a 0.01% chance they could lose.

But to risk that type or r:r on a horse prior to the off is just plain stupid.

As today highlighted.
cybernet69

Following on from my last post.

Since Betfair began, if you had bet every odds on or worse horse then you would be left with a loss overall.

However, backing the favourite before the off who's odds drifted to 20/1 in-play would have produced a positive profit overall.

I would rather risk £20 to win £100 than risk £100 to win £20 or worse return.
Post Reply

Return to “Trading Horse racing”