Coronavirus - A pale horse,4 men and ....beer

A place to discuss anything.
Locked
jamesg46
Posts: 3771
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 1:05 pm

alexmr2 wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 8:57 pm
greenmark wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 8:28 pm
alexmr2 wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 8:20 pm


Everyone that took the smallpox vaccine died

received_232269945073895.jpeg
How about polio, Measles/Mumps/Rubella? Next you'll be saying malaria was a hoax!
Or how about the advances in cancer treatment? Anything on that alexmr2?
I don't deny those diseases and effective treatments for them exist, I just think there's enough data to see that this Covid-19 virus is no threat to over 99% of the population. I think people need to relearn to accept a degree of risk, a similar risk to the flu which has always been around. The response is such an overreaction that it's obvious that there is something more to it e.g. an economic or sustainability agenda, not a health crisis.

I'm not going to advise people whether to get the vaccine or not. I formed my opinion from research and the experience of others that it's unneccessary and contains more potential risk than the virus itself
Unfortunately Alex you're preaching to minds that don't repect their own intuitive signals.... they're soaked in msm narrative. Brains are like sponges, they absorb the popular surrounding. I have a great deal of respect that you're standing up for what you actually see, rather than what you're told to see. If only more people actually opened their eyes.
greenmark
Posts: 6266
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:15 pm

jamesg46 wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 11:01 pm
alexmr2 wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 8:57 pm
greenmark wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 8:28 pm

How about polio, Measles/Mumps/Rubella? Next you'll be saying malaria was a hoax!
Or how about the advances in cancer treatment? Anything on that alexmr2?
I don't deny those diseases and effective treatments for them exist, I just think there's enough data to see that this Covid-19 virus is no threat to over 99% of the population. I think people need to relearn to accept a degree of risk, a similar risk to the flu which has always been around. The response is such an overreaction that it's obvious that there is something more to it e.g. an economic or sustainability agenda, not a health crisis.

I'm not going to advise people whether to get the vaccine or not. I formed my opinion from research and the experience of others that it's unneccessary and contains more potential risk than the virus itself
Unfortunately Alex you're preaching to minds that don't repect their own intuitive signals.... they're soaked in msm narrative. Brains are like sponges, they absorb the popular surrounding. I have a great deal of respect that you're standing up for what you actually see, rather than what you're told to see. If only more people actually opened their eyes.
"I formed my opinion from research and the experience of others".
Let's hear it then.
jamesg46
Posts: 3771
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 1:05 pm

Forest Gump said "life is like a box of chocolates"

Reality is "Life is one big test tube"

People are the droplets.
greenmark
Posts: 6266
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:15 pm

jamesg46 wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 11:14 pm
Forest Gump said "life is like a box of chocolates"

Reality is "Life is one big test tube"

People are the droplets.
Ok that says everything. Ciao!
Trader Pat
Posts: 4327
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:50 pm

greenmark wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 11:16 pm
jamesg46 wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 11:14 pm
Forest Gump said "life is like a box of chocolates"

Reality is "Life is one big test tube"

People are the droplets.
Ok that says everything. Ciao!

Taking on Alex & James? And after 10pm too?

Braver man than me Greenmark :lol:
jamesg46
Posts: 3771
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 1:05 pm

Trader Pat wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 11:17 pm
greenmark wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 11:16 pm
jamesg46 wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 11:14 pm
Forest Gump said "life is like a box of chocolates"

Reality is "Life is one big test tube"

People are the droplets.
Ok that says everything. Ciao!

Taking on Alex & James? And after 10pm too?

Braver man than me Greenmark :lol:
A discussion isn't "taken on" anybody, unless you're tribal.
User avatar
alexmr2
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 12:32 am

greenmark wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 9:19 pm
The vaccine has been administered to 13 million. With vaccines adverse reactions happen rapidly. So far absolutely no bad reports. AND those people are now much less likely to contract the virus. And that's a fact established by highly qualified professionals.
But also flu vaccination happens every year, specifically to reduce deaths. Lockdowns were the solution in the absence of vaccines. What's so difficult to understand?
Economic agenda? Can you not see the economic cost of this? There is no advantage to anyone. Even the PPE makers are facing reducing supply as demand drops. Ditto logistics companies, possibly even the likes of Amazon when people return to the high street.
The govt has to strike a balance between a tanking economy and the suicidal political decision to do nothing. And believe me it would be political suicide to let the virus rip.
Correlation isn't neccessarily causation, but the statistics and stories of Covid breakouts in carehomes since the vaccine rollout began aren't showing it to be very effective.
FB_IMG_1613143797058.jpg
I'm not saying the vaccine is designed to intentionally harm people but the first dose supresses the immune system for around 1 week and this isn't being clearly advertised. If someone contracts the virus in this period it can be even worse. The long term effects of this new mRNA treatment are unknown and usually everything in life must be paid for by some sort of tradeoff or side effect. Inducing immune system responses seems unneccessary and bad in the long term. When big money is involved scepticism shouldn't be a bad thing
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 25159
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am

alexmr2 wrote:
Sat Feb 13, 2021 2:02 am
I'm not saying the vaccine is designed to intentionally harm people but the first dose supresses the immune system for around 1 week and this isn't being clearly advertised. If someone contracts the virus in this period it can be even worse.
There's not much point in dispensing medical advice unless you quote the source, Dr Alex. Nobody's going to trust you. I thought you suggested its sole purpose was to plant the Bill Gate chip, in which case, why would it even affect your immune system? After all, it's not a vaccine.
StellaBot
Posts: 842
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 11:52 am

I havent seen a comparison of

same age group v same age group deaths graphs

eg the 40-50s graph
50-60s
etc

since beginning
and new variants and a new vaccine being made for same

;)
User avatar
alexmr2
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 12:32 am

One of the most important things I learnt about coronavirus was, that the fear of losing your life can actually be your biggest obstacle to living it!
Screenshot_20210214-001511_Facebook.jpg
See many parallels between trading and pandemic responses I do
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Derek27
Posts: 25159
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:44 am

alexmr2 wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 12:26 am
One of the most important things I learnt about coronavirus was, that the fear of losing your life can actually be your biggest obstacle to living it!

Screenshot_20210214-001511_Facebook.jpg

See many parallels between trading and pandemic responses I do
Not comparable. If you risk £10 that is the absolute limit to your risk, so you can weigh it against your potential gain and probability of it. You can't lose you're life savings nor can anyone else.

If I caught covid last year, statistically I'm not likely to need hospital treatment but my mother and half the residents in her care home could have died from it if I passed it on.

I guess you think that doesn't matter because they're all over 65 with health problems and might die anyway?
greenmark
Posts: 6266
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:15 pm

Derek27 wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 12:58 am
alexmr2 wrote:
Sun Feb 14, 2021 12:26 am
One of the most important things I learnt about coronavirus was, that the fear of losing your life can actually be your biggest obstacle to living it!

Screenshot_20210214-001511_Facebook.jpg

See many parallels between trading and pandemic responses I do
Not comparable. If you risk £10 that is the absolute limit to your risk, so you can weigh it against your potential gain and probability of it. You can't lose you're life savings nor can anyone else.

If I caught covid last year, statistically I'm not likely to need hospital treatment but my mother and half the residents in her care home could have died from it if I passed it on.

I guess you think that doesn't matter because they're all over 65 with health problems and might die anyway?
Spot on! Well said.
User avatar
Realrocknrolla
Posts: 1910
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2020 7:15 pm

F1732DA9-BB50-4241-AC91-0B9AC03467AC.jpeg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
gazuty
Posts: 2553
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 11:03 am

User avatar
firlandsfarm
Posts: 3317
Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:20 am

Atho55 wrote:
Fri Feb 12, 2021 6:57 pm
With Tesco you can pay £3.99 pm and have free home deliveries over certain days. Why subject yourself to exposure in such a way for a measly amount.
I tried home delivery when it was in it's early stages and decided never to buy fresh foods that way again. It seemed to me that they used it as an excuse to get rid of all the poor quality food that they knew would not sell on the shelf! I would be happy to use delivery for non-fresh food but if I then have to go there to shop for fresh food I might as well shop for it all
Locked

Return to “General discussion”