tico wrote: ↑Mon Oct 20, 2025 9:01 pm
... remember Farage wants full privatisation of the NHS ...
As you may know I often question such allegations via ChatgPT and ask it to fact check such assertions. This I did, I asked "Has Nigel Farage ever said he wants full privatisation of the NHS?". ChatGPT replied ...
"Short answer: I can’t find any reliable record of Nigel Farage saying—in so many words—that he “wants full privatisation of the NHS.”
What he has said: in 2014 he was filmed arguing the NHS should “move towards an insurance-based system run by private companies.” That’s often described by opponents as “privatisation,” but it isn’t him explicitly calling for full privatisation.
His later/public line: Farage/UKIP/Reform have repeatedly stated the NHS should remain “free at the point of use,” and fact-checkers have noted this when assessing claims about scrapping/privatising the NHS.
Recent nuance: in 2025 he said he was “open to” an insurance-based model; outlets summarised this as moving away from the current NHS funding model, which critics equate with privatisation—but again, that’s not the same as him saying he wants “full privatisation.”"
It's the usual problem ... something is said, it is misquoted/mis-interpreted ... it is reproduced many times by those with an axe to grind without checking the facts until it becomes 'the truth'!
He just wants it to be more efficiently run ... can't see the harm in that. Rather that than the current position where it is run by a load of Civil Servants who think an index linked final salary pension is an example of efficiency. Why do you want me to pay for the inefficiencies you enjoy?